Skip to main content
image 2026 09 07 144654956
|

Exclusive.. Eastern Region Audit Bureau Detects Corruption at the Ministry of Labour of the Libyan Government Affiliated with the Parliament

Our source exclusively obtained a copy of a report from the Audit Bureau’s Eastern Region branch documenting corruption within the Ministry of Labour of the Libyan government affiliated with the Parliament.

The report stated that LYD 1.998 million was paid to “Al-Tahdir” Company to conduct an overseas training course through direct contracting, in violation of the administrative regulations. It also reported the payment of LYD 137,700 to “Al-An’am Al-Shahiya” Company for supplying phones and screens outside the scope of the contract and without the involvement of the tender committee.

The Bureau’s report also revealed that LYD 118,300 was paid to “Darajat Al-Tamayoz” Company for a graduation ceremony without obtaining competing bids and at inflated prices. In addition, LYD 52,000 was paid in salaries to employees of the Sebha Labour Office without supporting documents proving their employment relationship.

The report further stated that LYD 16,400 was paid to “Al-Alamiya” Company for supplying computers and a printer without completing the required documentation.

It added that LYD 10,000 was spent on training programs in Sebha that fall under the responsibilities of the Ministry of Social Affairs. LYD 299,700 was paid to “Al-Wahaj Al-Mumayaz” Company under a cancelled payment authorization and without conducting a financial evaluation. LYD 157,500 was paid to “Alam Al-Tadreeb” Company without submitting lists of trainees, while LYD 105,000 was paid to “Al-Intilaq” Company without attaching the final report.

According to the Bureau’s report, LYD 105,000 was paid to “Ayqona” Center without evaluation reports proving that the training courses had been carried out. It also reported the payment of LYD 114,000 in housing allowances to 17 employees of the Labour Unit without documented contracts.

The report concluded by stating that LYD 78,000 was paid as housing allowances without clarifying the beneficiaries’ status or eligibility requirements. In addition, LYD 6,000 was paid as a three-month housing allowance without attaching a rental agreement or proof of receipt of the cheque.

Share