The former Head of the Administrative Control Authority, Abdul Salam Al-Hassi, emphasized the vital role of regulatory bodies in general, and the Administrative Control Authority in particular, in addressing administrative and financial violations that harm the public interest and public funds. This role aligns with the authority’s founding law, which grants it the power to review and examine existing laws, decisions, and regulations as stipulated in Article 25 of its establishment law.
He added that while the authority’s measures should align with its legally mandated powers to gain acceptance and respect from all, there are serious reasons cited in the publication. Nevertheless, he acknowledged the existence of violations in appointment decisions issued by many entities under its supervision.
Al-Hassi noted, however, that the decision conflicts with Article 50 of Law No. 20 for the year 2013, which established the Administrative Control Authority. This article outlines the procedures the authority must follow when dealing with decisions issued by entities subject to its oversight.
He pointed out that the Cabinet, ministries, and affiliated entities are required to submit copies of their meeting minutes and decisions to the authority immediately after issuance. These entities must also send the authority copies of correspondence that grant benefits, impose financial obligations, or result in changes to powers or legal statuses.
He concluded by stating that if the authority finds that the decisions referred to it by supervised entities violate applicable legislation, it should challenge these decisions in administrative courts. Filing such a challenge automatically suspends the execution of the contested decision until a final ruling is issued.
