Skip to main content

Tag: central bank

Al-Farsi: Letters of Credit in Libya; Where Does Each Party’s Responsibility Begin and End?

Ayoub Al-Farsi, a member of the Central Bank’s Monetary Policy Committee, wrote an article in which he stated:

Addressing the issue of letters of credit, which drains foreign currency reserves, begins with identifying the parties involved and holding each one accountable for its responsibilities.

The process of importing goods through letters of credit in Libya involves a series of procedures, with responsibilities distributed among several entities. These begin with the Ministry of Economy and Trade, which is responsible for regulating commercial activity and licensing companies, followed by commercial banks, which deal directly with companies and open letters of credit. The process then involves the Central Bank of Libya, which provides foreign currency to banks to cover their customers’ requests, followed by customs authorities and regulatory bodies at border crossings, and finally the entities responsible for monitoring goods and prices in the domestic market.

It is important to distinguish between these areas of authority and define each entity’s responsibilities at every stage.

1. Ministry of Economy and Trade: Regulating Commercial Activity and Licensing Companies

Responsibility begins with the Ministry of Economy and Trade and its affiliated entities responsible for commercial registration and licensing, as these bodies regulate commercial activity and establish the legal framework governing import and trade activities.

Under applicable legislation and regulations, their responsibilities include registering and licensing companies and commercial establishments, defining the activities they are permitted to conduct, and verifying that they meet the legal requirements necessary to operate.

Accordingly, a company applying to a bank to open a letter of credit should have already fulfilled the requirements for its establishment, registration, and licensing with the relevant authorities. Its legal and commercial documents must also be valid under the applicable legislation.

2. Commercial Banks: Customer Relations and Opening Letters of Credit

Once a company has established its legal and commercial standing, responsibility shifts to the commercial bank with which it deals.

The commercial bank opens the customer’s account, receives the application to open a letter of credit, verifies compliance with applicable banking requirements and regulations, and is responsible for examining and verifying the submitted documents in accordance with the procedures and rules governing banking operations and letters of credit.

Therefore, the direct relationship with the importing company, acceptance of its application, completion of the documentation required to open the letter of credit, and verification of those documents are primarily the responsibility of the commercial bank serving the customer.

After completing these procedures, the commercial bank forwards the foreign-currency coverage request to the Central Bank of Libya in accordance with the approved mechanisms and regulations.

3. Central Bank of Libya: Providing Foreign Currency to Banks

At this stage, the Central Bank of Libya acts as the monetary authority responsible for managing foreign currency and regulating its use.

The Central Bank does not deal directly with the importing company when a letter of credit is opened. Instead, it deals with the commercial bank, which submits a coverage request on behalf of its customer.

The Central Bank’s responsibilities include establishing the general framework and regulations governing the use of foreign currency, receiving coverage requests submitted by banks, and providing the foreign currency required to cover approved letters of credit through the authorized mechanisms, against settlement of their value in Libyan dinars.

It is therefore necessary to distinguish between the commercial bank’s responsibility for its relationship with the customer and the procedures and documentation involved in opening a letter of credit, and the Central Bank’s responsibility for providing foreign-currency coverage to the commercial bank and supervising it within the scope of its banking mandate.

4. Customs Authority and Border Agencies: Verifying the Arrival of Goods

Once a letter of credit has been opened and the goods have been shipped, the process moves into a separate stage that differs entirely from the provision of foreign currency.

Responsibility for verifying that goods have physically arrived in Libya and entered through official border crossings lies with the relevant authorities operating at those crossings, primarily the Libyan Customs Authority.

Customs authorities handle the procedures relating to the shipment, verify the information and documentation within their remit, and record the entry and release of goods in accordance with applicable legal procedures.

Consequently, physically tracking the arrival of goods and verifying their entry into the country are not field responsibilities of the Central Bank of Libya. They fall under the jurisdiction of the relevant border authorities.

5. Relevant Regulatory Authorities: Product Safety and Compliance with Standards

Ensuring that imported goods are safe and comply with approved specifications and standards falls under the responsibility of the relevant technical and regulatory authorities, depending on the type of product.

These include the National Center for Food and Drug Control, which oversees products within its jurisdiction. Its responsibilities include inspection, testing, analysis, and taking the prescribed measures to determine whether products comply with applicable requirements and standards before they are permitted to enter circulation, in accordance with its mandate.

Accordingly, opening a letter of credit or providing foreign currency to import a product does not, in itself, establish that the product is safe or compliant with applicable standards. That responsibility belongs to the relevant technical authorities.

6. Monitoring Goods and Prices in the Domestic Market

Once goods have entered the country, been cleared, and reached the market, another stage begins, involving domestic trade, pricing, and on-the-ground monitoring.

Responsibility at this stage returns to the relevant executive and regulatory authorities. These include the Ministry of Economy and Trade, which regulates commercial activity and oversees matters within its remit relating to prices, profit margins, and the circulation of goods, as well as the Municipal Guard, which conducts field inspections, enforces regulations, and monitors shops and warehouses for compliance with applicable legislation and decisions.

Security authorities and the relevant prosecution bodies are also responsible for investigating smuggling, fraud, monopolistic practices, and economic crimes whenever there is suspicion of a violation or criminal offence.

Conclusion

When discussing letters of credit, it is important not to assign responsibility for an entire chain of procedures to a single entity when several institutions have overlapping but distinct mandates.

The Ministry of Economy and Trade and the relevant registration and licensing authorities are responsible for establishing the legal framework within which companies conduct commercial activities. Commercial banks are responsible for their relationships with customers, ensuring that the requirements for opening letters of credit are met, and examining submitted documents in accordance with applicable regulations. The

Exclusive: Central Bank Opens Foreign Transfers for Private Clinics, Capped at $500,000 Annually

Our source has obtained a copy of a circular issued by the Central Bank of Libya allowing banks to make direct foreign transfers to private medical service companies (private clinics), provided their annual imports do not exceed $500,000 (five hundred thousand US dollars). The transfers are intended to import spare parts, equipment, and medical devices of an urgent nature for the clinics’ own use, through the coverage request system established for this purpose.

The Central Bank’s circular further stated that the following rules and conditions must be observed:

  • The maximum amount for a single foreign transfer to private medical service companies (private clinics) is $250,000 (two hundred and fifty thousand US dollars), or its equivalent in other foreign currencies.
  • Private medical service companies (private clinics) must be operational and actively conducting business, with supporting documentation provided. They must also hold a valid Central Bank of Libya (CBL) banking code.
  • A private medical service company may not apply for a second payment until the first payment has been fully executed and supporting documents confirming the supply, shipment, and arrival of the goods have been submitted. The most important of these documents are customs declarations proving that the goods have entered the country.

The circular added that banks must complete all procedures for foreign transfers within a maximum of two weeks from the date they receive their customers’ requests.

The company requesting the bank transfer must maintain an account with the bank executing the transfer. The requested transfer amount must be 100% fully covered in Libyan dinars from the available balance in the account at the time the transfer is executed.

The circular also stipulates that companies must submit an undertaking to import the goods into Libya through official entry points and use the funds for the purpose specified in the transfer request.

Companies must provide original customs declarations proving that the imported goods entered Libya through official entry points. These declarations must be submitted to the banks within three months of the transfer date. Banks are required to notify the Banking and Monetary Control Department of any failure to submit the required customs declarations.

The circular further requires the company requesting the transfer to submit a pro forma invoice issued and approved by the exporting or manufacturing company, or one of its authorized agents registered with the relevant authorities in the exporting country. The invoice must specify the items and value of the goods to be imported.

The company issuing the pro forma invoice must be registered with the relevant authorities, including the Ministry of Economy in the country where the invoice was issued, as well as the commercial registry in its country of domicile. The invoice must also specify the port of arrival and the shipping method. Pro forma invoices issued by general trading companies of any kind will not be accepted.

The Central Bank’s circular concluded by requiring banks to refrain from executing transfers for private medical service companies (private clinics) that have previously made transfers but failed to submit the required customs declarations within the specified period.

Banks must also comply with all anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing regulations issued under the relevant laws and instructions.

In addition, banks are required to exercise enhanced due diligence to ensure that all documents required for the transfers are available, verify the accuracy of the information provided by the company requesting the transfer, and confirm that no circumstances exist that would prevent the transfer from being executed.

Paris Court Upholds Seizure of National Oil Corporation Assets in Al-Kharafi Case

Lawyer Khaled Al-Zaidi said that the Paris Court of First Instance has upheld a ruling dated September 10, 2026, maintaining the seizure imposed by Mohammad Abdulmohsen Al-Kharafi & Sons on assets belonging to the National Oil Corporation (NOC), while rejecting a request by a Libyan entity to lift the seizure.

The decision comes as part of enforcement proceedings related to an arbitration award issued in 2013, whose original value was approximately $935 million, with the claim exceeding $1 billion after interest was taken into account.

He added that the ruling is significant because it concerns the enforcement of arbitration awards against NOC assets and raises legal questions regarding whether the corporation can be considered an entity affiliated with or an extension of the state for enforcement purposes, the nature of the seized assets, and the scope of immunity from enforcement under French law.

It also concerns the distinction between immunity from enforcement and rules relating to sanctions or asset freezes.

Exclusive.. CBL Governor: Higher Oil Prices in October Will Help the Bank Inject $3 Billion and Address Pent-Up Demand for Foreign Currency

Libya’s Central Bank Governor, Naji Issa, said in exclusive remarks to our source that the Central Bank of Libya is working with all relevant institutions and stakeholders to adhere to the unified spending agreement and implement reforms in fiscal, trade, and monetary policy.

He added that positive steps are being taken to control government spending and move toward adopting a unified salary scale for all state institutions funded through the general budget. He also pointed to reforms in several other areas, noting that there has been a positive response from all parties.

The governor continued: “The Central Bank will work to contain the rise in the exchange rate in order to limit increases in the prices of goods and services, contain inflation, and increase the value of the dinar, which is a key objective.”

He added that benefiting from higher oil prices in October will help the bank inject $3 billion and address pent-up demand for foreign currency for letters of credit and personal purposes, including cards and cash.

“There will also be a significant expansion of direct transfers for small traders, in light of the implementation of the Economy Minister’s decision to prohibit imports except through banking transactions,” he said.

Exclusive: Central Bank: Exchange Rate to Fall Below LYD 9 at Beginning of October, with $3 Billion Injection Targeted

The Central Bank of Libya exclusively told our source that it is working on a plan to contain the market based on a set of priorities, and that the exchange rate will fall below LYD 9 at the beginning of October.

It added that the Central Bank will absorb an acceptable deficit to contain the market if oil revenues do not cover the required amount, with a target of injecting $3 billion starting in October until reaching the targeted interim rate. This measure will also support the unification of the salary schedule, along with a number of financial and economic reforms that will be announced later.

Exclusive: Central Bank Plans to Inject Foreign Currency in Coming Days to Support Exchange Market Stability

Our sources at the Central Bank of Libya confirmed that the bank plans to inject quantities of foreign currency in the coming days to support exchange market stability and improve the availability of foreign currency.

These measures come amid improvements in a number of economic indicators and oil revenues, alongside understandings and agreements with several economic partners aimed at supporting the national economy.

The sources confirmed that the Central Bank places importance on maintaining an appropriate level of foreign currency reserves to ensure sustainable monetary and financial stability, while maintaining specified levels of the deficit through the end of the year.

Exclusive.. Al-Sanussi: “Central Bank Approves Letters of Credit Today for Companies Affiliated with the Oheiba Family… Raising Questions Over Why They Were Favored Over Other Traders”

Media personality Ahmed Al-Sanussi said: The Central Bank of Libya approved letters of credit today for companies belonging to only one family, the Whiba family, according to our sources.

He questioned the reasons behind these approvals and why these companies were favored over other traders.

Exclusive.. Central Bank of Libya to Sada: Our Foreign Reserves Exceed LYD 400 Billion and Cover the LYD 210 Billion Money Supply

The Central Bank of Libya confirmed to our source that the country’s foreign-currency reserves are in a comfortable position and cover the money supply of the Libyan dinar, known as the money supply, which stands at LYD 210 billion. Meanwhile, liquid and readily convertible foreign reserves exceed LYD 400 billion, indicating that monetary balance is in place.

The Central Bank can also achieve stability if public spending is controlled, deficit financing is avoided, and a rapid economic reform program is put in place.

Exclusive.. “Central Bank”: $380 Million Sold Today for Letters of Credit and Personal Purposes

The Central Bank of Libya confirmed to our source that it continues to sell foreign currency today, with $300 million sold for letters of credit and $80 million for personal purposes.

The Central Bank explained that foreign-currency sales operations are continuing in an organized manner until all letters of credit and personal-purpose requests are fully settled, noting that the pace of sales will accelerate in the coming period amid the relative increase in oil revenues.

Al-Shalawi: “Between Oil Figures and Central Bank Figures… Where Does the Picture of Libya’s Public Finances Become Complete?”

Written by oil and economic expert Abdelmonsef Al-Shalawi

A reading of the January–August 2026 data: Transparency matters, but the financial picture remains incomplete without the missing link

When official figures are published, their real value does not lie solely in the size of the figure itself, but in our ability to understand what lies behind it: Where did it come from? When was it realized? Where was it deposited? How was it transferred? What was spent from it? And on which items?

From this perspective, the data published by public institutions are not merely financial tables, but pieces of a single economic picture that should ultimately come together before citizens, decision-makers, and experts.

In this context, the Central Bank of Libya’s statement on revenues and expenditures through August 31, 2026, comes alongside the monthly data that the National Oil Corporation continues to publish on production, revenues, and transfers.

A professional reading of these data should not begin with the question, “Which figure is correct?” but rather with the more important question:

How can we connect the figures issued by different institutions within a single financial system that makes the movement of public funds traceable from source to destination?

The National Oil Corporation… Disclosure of the Productive Sector

It is fair to say that the National Oil Corporation has made significant progress recently in publishing data related to production and revenues.

The Corporation regularly publishes summaries covering crude oil production, the state’s share, partners’ share, quantities available for export, refining quantities, oil and gas uses, as well as revenues collected, transfers, and the budget received.

In its August 2026 data, for example, the Corporation announced production of more than 43.3 million barrels of crude oil. It also announced the transfer of approximately $2.555 billion to the sovereign account, in addition to royalties and concession contract taxes, while explaining the mechanism for handling fuel supply credits.

This disclosure practice deserves recognition because it provides economic and oil-sector observers with important primary material for understanding the sector’s performance.

The publication of data is also not limited to revenues, but extends to natural gas and the quantities delivered to various sectors, which is important when assessing the Libyan energy economy as a whole.

But the Oil Figure Is Not the Final Financial Figure

This is where I believe a point worthy of further calm discussion begins.

The revenue announced by the National Oil Corporation and the revenue appearing in the Central Bank of Libya’s data are not necessarily the same figure at the same time or according to the same accounting basis.

The Corporation deals with production, sales, collection, transfers, and reconciliations, while the Central Bank of Libya presents revenues and expenditures from the perspective of flows entering public accounts and what is recorded and spent within the financial system.

Therefore, comparing two figures from different sources without knowing the accounting date of each figure, the nature of the revenue, the collection mechanism, the reconciliation process, and the entity through which the financial flow passed may lead to hasty conclusions.

The Corporation had previously explained, in one of its statements, that revenues collected in February represented crude oil sales for the month of January. It also explained the mechanism for reserving funds to cover part of the cost of fuel.

These details are not marginal; they are at the heart of understanding the differences between the figures.

What Does the Central Bank of Libya’s Statement Say?

The Central Bank of Libya’s statement through August 31 provides an important picture of the revenue and expenditure side.

Total revenues amounted to approximately LYD 98.98 billion, including around LYD 80.8 billion in oil sales revenues and LYD 15.3 billion in oil royalties, while other revenues from taxes, customs, telecommunications, and other sources were significantly lower.

Recorded expenditure amounted to approximately LYD 68.61 billion, distributed mainly among salaries, operational expenditures, subsidies, and development. The statement itself indicates that the figure for the first expenditure category does not include August salaries, an important detail when reading total expenditure and avoiding treating it as a final, closed figure for the year.

These figures alone reveal a fundamental economic reality:

Libya’s public finances remain highly dependent on oil revenues, while the largest share of public expenditure continues to go toward current, social, and operational items rather than investment and development.

This is not an observation about any particular institution, but rather an issue concerning the structure of the economy and public finances as a whole.

The Corporation Is Not the Entire Public Finance System

From here, I believe it is important to distinguish between institutions and their respective roles.

The National Oil Corporation is the technical and commercial arm of the oil sector. It is responsible for production, development, exports, and managing oil activities within its mandate.

The management of public finances, setting priorities, the budget, public expenditure, reconciliations, and government accounts, on the other hand, constitute a broader system than the Corporation itself.

Therefore, holding a single institution responsible for explaining the entire movement of public funds may not be institutionally accurate.

At the same time, calls for greater disclosure by the Corporation remain legitimate, as do calls for more detail from the Central Bank of Libya. But the greater need is for these disclosures to come together within a single system.

The Missing Link We Need: The Ministry of Finance

This brings me to the most important point in this analysis.

For citizens and experts to understand what happened to public funds during the first eight months of 2026, we need an integrated view from the Ministry of Finance that connects revenues appearing in government accounts with actual expenditure, clarifies the basis of recording and reconciliation and the timing of revenue recognition, and links appropriations to actual expenditures.

The Central Bank of Libya’s statement provides an important part of the picture.

The National Oil Corporation’s reports provide another important part.

But without detailed and systematic financial data from the Ministry of Finance, a gap remains between the oil figure and the final financial figure.

This gap is not necessarily evidence of a problem or violation; rather, it is an information gap that should be closed if we want to achieve the highest levels of financial transparency.

True transparency does not mean that every institution simply publishes its figures.

More mature transparency means that a researcher can take a figure from one institution, trace it through the next institution, and determine where it ended up, how it was reconciled, and under which item it appeared in government accounts.

What We Need Is Not More Figures… But More Connections

Perhaps the most useful step now is to move from the concept of “individual disclosure” to the concept of “integrated disclosure.”

In other words, we need a unified table or periodic statement through which an observer can follow the following path:

Oil production
↓
Sales and exports
↓
Revenues collected
↓
Reconciliations and deductions
↓
Transfer to sovereign accounts
↓
Revenue recorded in public finances
↓
Appropriations
↓
Actual expenditure
↓
Cumulative balance or deficit

Only then can we move from simply reading figures to reading the economy itself.

What Do the Eight-Month Figures Tell Us?

First, they tell us that the oil sector remains the backbone of public revenues.

Second, they tell us that the volume of current and social expenditure remains large compared with development expenditure. The Central Bank’s statement shows that expenditure under the third category, namely development, amounted to only around LYD 912.8 million, compared with LYD 46.9 billion for the first category and LYD 11.8 billion for subsidies.

These ratios deserve an independent economic discussion because they concern not only the size of expenditure, but also the nature of expenditure and its ability to create added value, employment opportunities, and diversify sources of income.

The economy’s dependence on oil also means that any improvement in production or prices has a direct impact on public finances. Conversely, any decline in production, prices, or exports quickly creates pressure on the budget, exchange rate, and public expenditure.

Fairness to the Corporation Does Not Mean Exempting It from Accountability

It is important here to emphasize a point that I consider essential in any professional discussion.

Presenting the National Oil Corporation in a positive light does not mean exempting it from criticism or oversight.

On the contrary, the best protection for the National Oil Corporation is greater professional transparency.

The more detailed, consistent, and comparable the data become, the easier it is to defend the Corporation when the figures are in its favor, and the easier it is to identify any shortcomings when problems do exist.

This is the difference between institutional defense and personal defense.

We do not need to defend individuals.

We need to defend the institution, the sector, public funds, and the rules of governance.

Conclusion

The data published by the National Oil Corporation and the Central Bank of Libya for the period from January to August 2026 provide highly important material for understanding the Libyan economy. At the same time, however, they reveal the need for a higher level of integration in financial disclosure.

The National Oil Corporation publishes an important part of the oil story.

The Central Bank of Libya publishes an important part of the revenue and expenditure story.

But the complete story requires the financial link that connects the two systematically. This highlights the importance of the regular publication of detailed financial data by the Ministry of Finance.

Therefore, the question I consider more important than “Where did the money go?” is:

How did the money move in the first place, from the moment the barrel was produced to the moment the revenue was recorded and spent?

When we can answer this question using interconnected figures, clear dates, and disclosed reconciliations, we will have moved from formal transparency to auditable transparency.

And this is the level Libya needs today.

Not more arguments over the figures…

But more connections between the figures.

Figures separated from their context may confuse public opinion. But when they are connected to one another, they become a tool for understanding the economy, evaluating performance, and protecting public funds.

Exclusive.. In Violation of Central Bank Instructions.. 300 Million Financing for Building Materials Company Raises Questions Over Benghazi Branch Exceptions

In violation of the instructions of the Central Bank of Libya, the Central Bank’s Benghazi branch granted financing worth 300 million to Al-Bareeq Al-Awal Building Materials Company, headed by “Faisal Naji Ahmed Wahiba” and his partner, “Ibrahim Misbah Ahmed Wahiba.”

The company was exempted from the suspension of financing, which, according to our sources, contributed to the rise in the dollar exchange rate on the parallel market.

Exclusive.. Benghazi Central Bank Grants Exceptions for Bank Financing Despite Suspension.. Sources Link Them to the Rise in the Parallel Exchange Rate

Our source exclusively obtained correspondence from the Central Bank of Libya’s Benghazi branch regarding a request by the National Commercial Bank to grant an exception to Safo Food Industries Company to obtain financing for the establishment of a beverage production plant, in view of the project’s economic importance and its contribution to the national economy, according to correspondence from the Banking and Monetary Control Department dated July 20, 2026.

The bank explained that the approval was based on Circulars No. (12/2025) and (25/2025) issued by the Banking and Monetary Control Department, allowing an exception to the maximum expansion limit of the credit portfolio, which may not exceed 7%, while temporarily suspending the granting of direct and indirect financing to legal entities.

It stressed the need to comply with all regulations and circulars issued by the Banking and Monetary Control Department, provide adequate guarantees, and exercise due diligence in this regard.

Exclusive.. Central Bank: Banning Imports Through the Black Market Will Enable Authorities to Set Commodity Prices and End Traders’ Excuse of the Dollar Rate

The Central Bank of Libya exclusively confirmed to our source that following the issuance of the two decisions by the Ministers of Economy banning the import of goods through the black market, the Ministry of Economy and the Central Bank will be able to impose specific prices on commodities based on the letters of credit.

It added: “Traders will no longer have an excuse to link prices to the dollar rate on the market.”

Al-Shahoumi Writes: Central Bank of Libya and Ministry of Economy, Coordination or an Impending Confrontation?

The founder of the Libyan Stock Market and finance professor, Suleiman Al-Shahoumi, published a post in which he wrote: Central Bank of Libya and Ministry of Economy, coordination or an impending confrontation?

Is the Central Bank, through coordination with the Ministry of Economy, trying to curb inflation or to rein in the exchange-rate turmoil?

By the end of this month, Ministry of Economy and Trade Decision No. (449) of 2026 will come into effect. The decision prohibits commercial goods from entering Libya outside the banking channels and prohibits customs clearance of any shipment before its banking and customs procedures have been completed and proof of its actual value has been provided. The decision makes an exception for individual business owners within an annual ceiling and sets out arrangements for shipments whose procedures had begun before this date.

The idea itself is sound. Bringing trade into the banking system makes the movement of money visible, helps combat money laundering, and allows the Central Bank to determine the actual level of demand for dollars. There is no disagreement over the objective. The disagreement concerns the sequencing and whether the official channel is ready to receive what will be directed through it in just a few weeks.

Let us begin with what matters to the citizen. When the price of a commodity rises at a store, we always assume that the reason is the rise in the dollar. This is only partly true. The commodity reaches the consumer after passing through a long chain that begins with financing and opening a letter of credit, followed by purchasing, shipping and insurance, then the port, customs, clearance, storage and transportation, and finally wholesale and retail. Any delay at any link in this chain becomes a cost, and every cost ultimately reaches the consumer. The citizen does not pay only for the commodity itself; they also pay for the journey it took to reach them.

What the figures say:

The figures announced for the first half of this year reveal a different picture from what is commonly believed. Letters of credit amounted to $8.3 billion, representing more than half of foreign-currency usage. This means that trade is already largely within the banking system and that imports are not all taking place outside it, as is often claimed. As for the portion targeted by the new decision, no figure has been announced for its size, making it difficult to prepare to accommodate something whose volume we do not know.

The same figures contain another indication worth considering. Foreign-currency cash sales for personal purposes fell by more than half, while transfers rose to $2.2 billion, compared with less than $300 million last year. Demand for dollars has therefore not declined; it has simply moved from one channel to another. This is precisely what should be expected once the Ministry of Economy’s decision takes effect: some trade will enter the letters-of-credit system, some will temporarily stop, and some will seek another, more expensive route. The additional cost will not be borne by the trader out of pocket; it will be added to the price.

There is a third figure that sums up the entire problem. Traders’ cards, which are supposed to serve small importers, did not exceed $38.9 million, or just two dollars out of every thousand. The tool intended for small traders is virtually inactive at the very moment small traders are being asked to move into the banking system. The exception included in the decision gives them the right to import, but it does not provide them with dollars or with the banking instrument through which the import process can be carried out.

The root of the gap is not imports:

The official exchange rate today is around LYD 6.34 per dollar, while the parallel market is at approximately LYD 9.25. Before discussing the gap, it is only fair to say that the proper comparison is not with the announced rate, but with the rate actually paid by the importer after adding the fee imposed on foreign-currency sales. The real gap is narrower than commonly stated, but it remains significant, and the fee itself becomes part of the cost of the commodity and ultimately reaches the consumer.

The reason behind this gap is not fundamentally commercial. The Central Bank itself attributed the two devaluations of the dinar within less than a year to government spending by two governments, the absence of a unified budget, and declining oil revenues. In other words, the imbalance originated on the spending side, not the import side. Restricting trade may reduce recorded demand for dollars, but it does not address the cause that created the gap. Anyone who addresses supply without addressing the underlying cause will find themselves facing the same problem months later, only in a new form.

A ban with a date and a facilitation promise without one:

The Central Bank and the Ministry of Economy say they are coordinating, and this is true on the surface. The Central Bank was the one that requested this decision and announced that it would accelerate foreign-currency requests in response to the Ministry of Economy’s decision.

But there is a fundamental difference between the two commitments. The ban was issued as a binding decision, with a specific date and a clear penalty: suspension of customs clearance. The facilitation, however, came in the form of a general agreement and a promise without a date, without a figure, and without a maximum timeframe for completing a letter-of-credit request. When the ban is clearly defined while the facilitation is not, it is natural for the first to be implemented on schedule while the second is delayed. This is precisely where regulation can turn into a new bottleneck.

The question of banks’ readiness also remains. The technical payment infrastructure is functioning and expanding, and this is not in doubt. However, foreign trade transactions are concentrated in a small number of banks, with one bank accounting for approximately $2.6 billion of usage in half a year. Adding thousands of small traders to the same banks means longer queues, not broader service. Moreover, the only practically available instrument is the letter of credit, which is designed for large transactions and requires guarantees that small traders do not possess. There is no short-term financing to cover the period between payment, arrival and sale, nor is there a credit record that allows a trader to be assessed based on their performance rather than their collateral. In addition, part of the time required to process a letter of credit is spent outside Libya, at correspondent banks and in meeting compliance requirements — time that cannot be controlled.

What should be done:

The solution is not to cancel the decision, but to support it with measures that make it implementable without making citizens pay the price. First, there should be a publicly disclosed estimate of the volume of imports currently conducted outside the banking system, because preparedness requires a figure, not an impression. Second, registration should be opened to importers before implementation, with the number of applications processed and the time taken measured, and the effective date should be linked to the results of this test rather than to a calendar date. Third, a genuine instrument for small traders should be activated, with a realistic ceiling and a banking product that actually works; otherwise, the exception will remain merely a provision on paper. Fourth, a maximum timeframe should be announced for processing letters of credit and transfer requests, with the actual average processing time published monthly. A trader can tolerate a slow procedure if its duration is known, but cannot tolerate an unknown procedure because uncertainty itself is added to the price. Fifth, there must be a clear arrangement for shipments that have already been contracted and actually shipped, because port delay penalties and storage costs will ultimately be passed on through the price of the commodity.

In the longer term, the Central Bank should address the source of the gap rather than its symptoms. It should announce a regular, quantified program for dollar sales for letters of credit and transfers, expand the number of banks capable of handling foreign-trade transactions, and publish monthly data on applications submitted, executed and rejected. The Ministry of Economy should consolidate procedures into a single window with announced timelines, measure and publish the time and cost of customs clearance at ports, and shift from monitoring the final price to identifying where costs have increased along the supply chain. It should ask one question about every new regulation: How many traders will this drive out of the market? Because the number of importers is not merely a matter of prices; it is a matter of supply security. If the market becomes dependent on a small number of companies, the failure of one of them can affect the entire market within days.

How should the policy be assessed after implementation?

Two months from now, it may be said that the rate of compliance with the decision is high, and this will be presented as a success. But that is not the measure of success. There are three criteria: Has the gap between the effective official exchange rate and the parallel-market rate narrowed? Has the time between submitting a letter-of-credit application and the shipment leaving the port decreased? And has the dinar price of the basic-goods basket stabilized compared with its price in the country of origin?

If all three improve together, the friction contributing to higher inflation will genuinely have declined. If only one improves, it means the bottleneck has not been resolved; it has simply moved from the foreign-exchange market to store shelves.

Ultimately, the goal is not to prevent traders from using another route, but to make the official route faster, cheaper and broader so that no one needs an alternative. The real test of this decision will not be the number of shipments it stops, but the price of the commodity three months after its implementation.

Exclusive.. Central Bank: We Will Accelerate Foreign Currency Sales to Banks Following Import Regulation Decisions

The Central Bank of Libya exclusively confirmed to our source that it will accelerate approvals for letters of credit and foreign currency sales to banks in order to ease financial demand, particularly following the issuance of decisions by the two economy ministers prohibiting imports except through banking transactions.

It added: “This week has seen a faster pace, reaching $600 million, and we will continue working toward the targeted amount of $2 billion for letters of credit and transfers.”