Skip to main content

Author: Amira Cherni

Exclusive: Central Bank Directs Banks to Open the Foreign Exchange System on January 5 – Here’s What Was Requested

Our source has exclusively obtained a circular from the Central Bank of Libya addressed to commercial banks, instructing them to begin accepting foreign exchange coverage requests through its system starting January 5 for various purposes.

The directive emphasized the need for banks to prepare their systems and get ready to accept requests from clients, including individuals, companies, and entities, for all purposes.

Exclusive: Allegations of Corruption and Money Laundering Among the Violations Uncovered by the Audit Bureau at Al-Wafa Bank and Referred to the Prosecutor

Our source has exclusively obtained a report from the Audit Bureau addressed to the Attorney General, detailing violations at Al-Wafa Bank involving documents, names, and numbers that suggest corruption and money laundering.

The documents reveal major violations and suspicions regarding the use of funds at Al-Wafa Bank, leading to the referral of responsible parties for investigation. They also disclose that some imported goods received through Misrata Port were not delivered to the country.

The report highlights the details of letters of credit issued to Al-Daleel Financial Company via Al-Wafa Bank’s branch, showing that the company obtained nine letters of credit amounting to a total of 80.712 million LYD, equivalent to $17.5 million.

According to the report’s findings, the bank branch executed the credits on December 13, 2022, deducting 9,336,860,000 LYD from the company’s account. The funds were returned to the account two days later, on December 15 of the same year, and were used to open a new credit, in violation of a Central Bank of Libya circular. Furthermore, the bank branch allowed the return of the previously deducted funds to the company’s account for the purpose of opening new credits, even though these funds belonged to the bank’s general administration.

The report also notes an incident on July 26, 2021, where a credit value of 2,048,692,000 LYD was deducted from the company’s account, and by August 4, 2021, the full amount was returned without any request from the company to cancel the credit. A data entry employee falsely recorded the transaction in the company’s account statement under “credit cancellation” to mislead auditors into believing the return was based on a customer request, which was untrue.

The Audit Bureau’s report referred to the Public Prosecutor’s Office includes recommendations to investigate the following individuals:

  • Abdulati Al-Tayeb, General Manager of Al-Wafa Bank
  • Al-Hadi Dhiyaf, Deputy Director of Banking Operations and External Relations
  • Mohamed Al-Kabir, Manager of the Bank’s Main Branch
  • Abdelhamid Qaddad, Head of Letters of Credit Department at the branch
  • Wissam Al-Tarifi, General Manager of Al-Daleel Company

The recommendations also call for forming a committee to review the legal files of exporting companies supplying goods via Al-Wafa Bank’s branch, to identify the board members of these companies. Examples include “Forever Trade General Company” and “Diamond Stars Trading for Plastic and Nylon Materials,” headquartered in the UAE, to establish potential links between the owners of exporting and importing companies.

The report cites Al-Mutawakkil Company, one of the exporters, where a shareholder, Suleiman Omar Aqil, a Libyan national, owns 49% of the company’s capital.

After the Fake Gasoline Scandal and Oil Sales Outside the Corporation… Financial Reports from Motor Oil Company Show That Libyan Oil Sales Have Incurred the Largest Losses in Its History

Financial reports for the years 2009, 2010, 2021, and 2022 from a leading company have shown that the average purchase prices for global crude oils, including Libyan Sidra crude, indicate substantial losses. Comparing the years 2009, 2010, 2021, and 2022, it was found that the losses resulting from the oil-for-fuel swap reached approximately $100 million annually for Sidra crude alone, based on an average production of about 290,000 barrels per day. This has become a significant economic disaster for a country that relies solely on oil as its income source. Below, we outline the direct and indirect damages added to these past losses.

Furthermore, according to financial reports between 2009 and 2010, Sidra crude was sold at a premium of $1.5 to $2 per barrel over competing Saudi Arabian Light Crude in Mediterranean markets, where Libyan crude dominated. However, after the oil swap deal and the involvement of brokerage companies between 2021 and 2022, the value of Sidra crude fell by 50 cents per barrel, meaning it was sold for less than Saudi Light Crude in Mediterranean markets.

Additionally, losses from the sale of Sidra crude in 2022 and the years before or after are estimated at $100 million annually. In contrast, from 2010 and prior years, Sidra crude sales generated profits of $150 million annually on average.

Sidra crude, considered a benchmark for Libyan crude, is part of a set of 12 different types of crude. Therefore, any decrease in Sidra crude’s value will affect the other Libyan crude types, leading to an escalating damage that cannot be fully assessed due to the lack of data.

According to the reports, the decline in the value of Libyan crude will also affect the settlement of contracts, tax collection, and royalties from oil companies, which are heavily dependent on the selling price of crude. Efforts are underway to gather data to estimate the size of these specific losses.

The reports also state that the drop in market value for Libyan crudes could extend its impact for two to three years, potentially lasting indefinitely unless addressed immediately. This would result in a significant decrease in revenue, putting pressure on the economy and affecting the strength of the Libyan dinar against the dollar.

Furthermore, data from the financial reports of the global company regarding official crude prices for the 2023 fiscal year did not include Libyan crude, indicating a lack of purchase of Libyan crude shipments. When compared to the 2023 audit report, it was confirmed that the company did not purchase any Libyan crude that year, and all oil shipments were fully bought by other UAE-based companies, some of which were new additions to previously existing companies, such as Mar, BG, and BP Energy, according to the Audit Bureau’s report.

Losses were measured only against competing crude, and no comparison was made with the Brent benchmark, meaning the losses could be even higher.

An oil expert stated to our source: “Thus, the total direct and indirect losses resulting from the barter system and dealings with corrupt and small companies are expected to reach between $250 million to $300 million annually. The total revenue losses from oil sales are estimated to be $600 million annually.”

He continued: “The annual losses from selling oil below its market value are easy to conceal and not detected by the Audit Bureau or any other entity unless through detailed auditing that surpasses state boundaries. Moreover, fuel smuggling, according to UN reports, has no local figures, and the sale outside the institution remains unaccounted for, making the exact losses hard to estimate. Ultimately, these losses are passed on to the citizens, either through fuel subsidy cuts or a devaluation of the Libyan dinar.”

He questioned: “How long will people remain passive and silent about the loss of their livelihood and the future of their children? Do we disbelieve international companies and reputable newspapers that respect the judiciary and the rule of law, while believing those who do not respect the law?”

Waha Oil Company Requests Ben Gdara to Contact the External Bank to Secure $800 Million Credit Coverage

Waha Oil Company has contacted the Chairman of the National Oil Corporation regarding its agreement with the Libyan External Bank to cover credits, with 25% of the coverage provided by the company and 75% by the bank, with a ceiling not exceeding $250 million.

The company stated that it is in discussions with the bank to possibly increase the mentioned ceiling to $800 million to ensure smooth operations and allow the opening of credits currently under process. The company is requesting approval to issue a letter to the bank, serving as a guarantee from the corporation to open the outstanding credits under process.

Exclusive: Following Instructions from Saleh and Dbeibeh to Recognize Shakshak as Audit Bureau Chief, Parliament Annuls Al-Saaiti’s Continuation in Office

Our source has obtained a directive from the House of Representatives to several public entities, nullifying the ruling that allowed Al-Saaiti to continue as Deputy Head of the Audit Bureau.

The Speaker of the House of Representatives recently reaffirmed the decision to maintain Khalid Shakshak as the head of the Audit Bureau.

Additionally, the Prime Minister of the Government of National Unity, Abdul Hamid Dbeibeh, has issued a circular instructing officials under his government to continue recognizing Khalid Shakshak as the Audit Bureau’s chief.

Exclusive: Ruvinetti Reveals the Financial Plan China Offers Libya in Exchange for Oil

Italian strategic expert Daniele Ruvinetti told our source on Sunday that China relies heavily on imported oil to sustain its economic growth. Despite its political instability, Libya holds significant oil reserves, making it a crucial partner for diversifying energy sources. By providing military equipment, China may aim to secure long-term access to Libyan oil under favorable terms.

Ruvinetti stated that Libya could offset its inability to pay in cash by offering oil instead. Such arrangements bypass traditional financial systems and could benefit China, enabling it to stabilize oil prices or secure energy supplies during market volatility.

He emphasized that China’s willingness to engage economically with unstable or high-risk countries like Libya is part of its broader strategy to collaborate with resource-rich developing nations. This approach allows China to expand its economic influence in areas where Western companies might hesitate to operate due to risks.

Ruvinetti pointed out that for Libya, receiving Chinese military equipment could enhance its ability to stabilize regions and protect critical infrastructure, including oil fields and export terminals. This could lead to increased oil production and exports, improving Libya’s economic situation in the short term.

He added that China’s direct engagement with Libya in the oil sector might stabilize or boost Libyan oil exports, impacting global supply and potentially lowering prices. However, such arrangements could limit Libya’s ability to diversify by tying its oil resources more closely to a single dominant buyer.

In summary, Ruffinetti highlighted that from an economic perspective, the deal reflects China’s strategy to leverage its industrial and technological capabilities to secure vital resources. It also offers Libya an alternative to traditional financial transactions in a challenging economic and political environment.

China Plans to Send Armed Drones to Libya Using Shell Company in Exchange for Libyan Oil, Telegraph Reveals

The Daily Telegraph has uncovered details of a Chinese plan to send armed drones worth $1 billion to Libya using a shell company based in the UK to bypass the international arms embargo.

According to the report, the plan aimed to deliver up to 92 drones capable of carrying multiple missiles from China to Libya, disguised as COVID-19 aid. This would directly violate the United Nations’ arms embargo. In return, Libya would unload barrels of crude oil to China at a discounted price, with the drone shipment being part of the payment.

The report highlighted that China hopes that arming Libya would expedite the end of the civil war, enabling Beijing to gain influence and establish a foothold in future trade relations with the country.

The investigation, ongoing in Canada, has identified three alleged conspirators involved in negotiating the deal while working at the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), a UN agency based in Montreal. The Telegraph reviewed emails discussing the plan between 2018 and 2021, which were cited in Canadian court documents. These emails revealed the use of a network of shell companies registered in the UK, Egypt, and Tunisia to carry out the transactions.

The investigation also sheds light on how UK-registered entities were exploited to avoid sanctions, masking payments and international transfers.

A Canadian investigator noted in court documents: “It appears that the Chinese government approved a strategy to help Libya purchase and ship military equipment through companies appointed by the Chinese government to conceal direct involvement by state agencies.”

The Telegraph further mentioned that the plan also involved the company Shanghai Gold Wing Aviation Technology, registered in the UK in May 2016, listing a Chinese national as the project manager. Despite little business activity since its incorporation, the company was central to this covert operation.

The police in Montreal have already charged two men in connection with the alleged conspiracy, including Fatih Ben Ahmed, involved in the oil aspect of the deal, and Mahmoud Mohamed Al-Swaih Saieh, who was reportedly involved in the entire plan. The men worked at ICAO when the negotiations were said to have taken place with the Chinese representative, Kwang Chi Wan.

The Telegraph also detailed that China’s interest in arming Libya was motivated by the desire to accelerate the end of the civil war, thereby allowing China to secure economic benefits once the fighting ceased. This would include gaining access to Libya’s high-quality crude oil, enhancing China’s energy security and expanding its presence in Africa.

Alia Ibrahim, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council specializing in MENA affairs, stated, “The idea is that this could be the first step in a long-term effort to leverage Libya’s resources, economy, and land to further Chinese interests in Africa.”

The article further noted that during the time of these discussions, Haftar was attempting to seize power from the UN-recognized government led by Prime Minister Abdulhamid Dbeibah, with drones playing a key role in the conflict. Haftar, who ultimately failed in his efforts, has since been rebuilding his military arsenal.

Jalel Al-Harshawi, a North Africa expert at the Royal United Services Institute, noted that the Haftar family understands that showing strength serves their interests. Haftar is believed to control much of Libya’s key oil assets, due to his ties with the National Oil Corporation’s head, Farhat Ben Qadara. This control enables him to engage in illicit deals with countries like China.

Experts believe the deal under investigation in Canada is just one part of a broader plan between China and Libya to arm Haftar, who is thought to still harbor ambitions of controlling all of Libya with the support of his sons.

The Telegraph also suggested that China, already the world’s largest exporter of drones, may be sending even larger quantities of weapons to other countries in secret. Other similar cases are under investigation in Italy and Spain, raising the likelihood of more Chinese arms shipments to follow.

Exclusive: Al-Harshawi Reveals the Growing Ties Between Haftar, Ben Gdara, and China in Oil Deal

Jalel Al-Harshawi, an expert on Libyan affairs at the Royal United Services Institute, spoke exclusively to our source on Saturday regarding the ongoing deal between Khalifa Haftar, his ally Ben Qadara, and China in exchange for Libyan oil.

Al-Harshawi stated that while it’s difficult to speculate on whether oil sales at a price below market value have continued, he expressed doubt that China would back out of the deal due to the Italian incident in June, where two shipments were intercepted. He highlighted that there are numerous alternative methods for shipping, including drones, and various ways to finance these operations.

He further mentioned that a clearer picture may emerge in the coming year, but emphasized that speculation at this stage should be avoided.

Exclusive: Abu Sriwil: “Removing Subsidies Is Currently More of an Attempt to Prevent Economic Collapse”

The international trade expert Yassin Abu Sriwil stated in an interview with our source that lifting subsidies in Libya is being presented as an option to address several economic challenges. However, under current circumstances, it appears to be more of an attempt to prevent economic collapse rather than a strategic decision based on a clear vision.

He added that the primary reasons cited for lifting subsidies include:

Budget Deficit:
Subsidies represent a significant financial burden on the state, with a large portion of revenues allocated to subsidizing essential goods and energy. This reduces the government’s ability to fund other developmental projects or improve public services. Subsidies in Libya indirectly benefit smugglers and certain parties who exploit price differences to smuggle fuel and imported goods to neighboring countries.

He also stated that lifting subsidies is seen as a measure to curb this financial drain:

  • Economic Infrastructure Collapse:
    Continuing subsidies depletes financial reserves and increases reliance solely on oil revenues, making the economy more vulnerable to fluctuations in oil prices.
  • International Recommendations:
    Some international organizations, such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, recommend rationalizing or removing subsidies as part of economic reforms to address distortions in the Libyan economy.

Why Does the Decision Face Significant Challenges?

  • Lack of Trust in the Government:
    Citizens do not trust that removing subsidies will be met with actual compensation or improvements in living conditions due to corruption and weak institutions.
  • Absence of an Effective Compensation System:
    Despite discussions about compensating citizens through cash transfers or direct support, there is no reliable infrastructure or administrative system to ensure fair implementation.
  • Deteriorating Security and Political Situation:
    Political divisions and conflicts make any economic reform a significant challenge.
  • Social Repercussions:
    Removing subsidies without clear alternatives could lead to a significant increase in prices, exacerbating the suffering of citizens, especially amidst widespread poverty and high unemployment rates.

He concluded by stating that lifting subsidies in Libya is not an easily implementable option at the moment. It is being proposed as a necessary step to avoid economic collapse. However, without comprehensive reform of the political and economic system, such a measure could result in even greater negative impacts on citizens.

Economist at the University of London Reveals How the Libyan Economy is Being Exploited

Dr. Mohsen Al-Salamouni, an economist at the London School of Economics, told our source on Thursday that the Libyan market is promising for investment. However, the economic situation worsens daily due to the exploitation by armed groups benefiting from the current instability.

Al-Salamouni emphasized to our source that for Libya to achieve economic growth, the country must rid itself of these controlling armed groups. Unfortunately, these groups have also exploited the nation’s wealth for their personal interests rather than for Libya’s development.

He added that Libya needs patriotic individuals with knowledge and expertise who can work towards unifying the country. They should focus on using power to build the economy, not to oppress the Libyan people. Libya has all the economic components to become a major economic power.

Commenting on Fuel Subsidy Removal… Ghaith to Sada: “If It’s About Budget Expenses, There Are Many Costs That Can Be Eliminated”

Former board member of the Central Bank of Libya, Mrajaa Ghaith, commented to our source regarding the removal of fuel subsidies approved by the Libyan government. He stated that the term “removal” is inaccurate, and the correct expression should be “substitution of subsidies.” From the perspective of justice and logic, removing subsidies is not a simple matter and cannot be a hasty decision taken lightly. It requires thorough studies, societal dialogue, and convincing citizens of the reasons behind substituting subsidies.

Ghaith added that if the issue concerns the large budget expenditures in this area, there are many other expenses that can be reduced or eliminated to save funds.

He also clarified that the state has revenues with external entities that it has not considered collecting. Subsidies should not be subject to political competition but rather should be a prudent decision based on careful studies.

Ghaith concluded his remarks by saying: “I do not understand whether this decision was discussed with the Central Bank of Libya. This is a political decision by the government. As for smuggling, it will not stop unless the price of fuel equals or exceeds its price in neighboring countries, so there is no profit in smuggling it. Technology can also be employed to combat smuggling by using tracking systems and requiring fuel to be sold only through a special card system instead of cash.”

Exclusive: South Tripoli Court Rules to Remove Shakshak’s Authority, Legal Administration Halts Execution of the Ruling

Our source has exclusively obtained correspondence from the Deputy of the Audit Bureau addressed to several officials within the bureau regarding the ruling of the South Tripoli Primary Court.

Al-Saiti formed a committee to carry out procedures for receiving the responsibilities held by Khaled Shakshak, closing the outgoing register, and shutting down the decision system under his authority. This follows the South Tripoli Court’s ruling to suspend him from duty and remove his official capacity.

In turn, the Legal Administration addressed the Audit Bureau, instructing the suspension of the enforcement of the administrative order issued against the Audit Bureau head, Khaled Shakshak, pending a session at the Tripoli Court of Appeal scheduled for February 2025.

Exclusive: The Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Mohamed Aoun to Return to His Duties as Minister of Oil

Oil Minister Mohamed Aoun confirmed in a correspondence exclusively obtained by our source that the Supreme Court’s ruling today, as the highest judicial authority in the state of Libya, established over 70 years ago, supports and affirms the decision of the Court of Appeal. He expressed gratitude, noting that the ruling is a clear indication of the integrity and impartiality of the Libyan judiciary.

He continued: “On this occasion, I renew my legitimate request and my rightful appeal to the legislative, judicial, and supervisory bodies in Libya to oblige the Prime Minister to implement these judicial rulings and to refrain from disregarding or undermining them.”

He also addressed foreign partners, urging them to comply with the rulings issued by Libyan courts, respect them, and implement them, while refraining from exploiting the current situation in the country or using it as an excuse. This is particularly relevant following the ruling of the Tripoli Court of Appeal on October 9, 2024, regarding the Chairman of the National Oil Corporation, which stated that he had lost the legitimacy to hold his public office and is considered an usurper of power. All of his official actions were declared null and void, and foreign partners should avoid entering into any agreements or work programs with him.

Aoun also drew the attention of Prime Minister Dbeibeh and the Deputy Minister of Oil and Gas, warning that failure to implement judicial rulings and disregarding them is a personal responsibility that will result in criminal prosecution and legal accountability, regardless of the time frame.

Finally, he directed international oil and energy organizations, particularly the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and the Arab Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OAPEC), to deal only with legitimate ministers and not allow any harm to these esteemed international organizations.

Exclusive: The Legal Advisor: “An Administrative Correspondence Cannot Be Used by the Audit Bureau’s Representative to Enforce a Judicial Ruling or Order”

The legal advisor, Hisham Al-Harati, stated exclusively to our source: “The Audit Bureau’s representative or any administrative employee is not permitted to enforce a judicial ruling or order through an administrative correspondence.”

He added: “The enforcement of judicial rulings and orders is exclusively carried out by bailiffs in accordance with the procedures outlined in the Libyan Code of Civil Procedure. This cannot be done through administrative directives. Any action contrary to this constitutes an overreach of administrative employees’ authority and violates the provisions of Article 365 of the Libyan Code of Civil Procedure, which stipulates that enforcement must be conducted by bailiffs based on the request of the benefiting party or their legal representative.”

He further clarified: “Therefore, this responsibility does not fall within the duties of an administrative employee. Hence, administrative correspondences issued by the Audit Bureau’s representative or any administrative body do not constitute a lawful means to enforce judicial rulings. Any action undertaken in this manner is a clear violation of the Libyan Code of Civil Procedure and exposes the violator to legal accountability.”

Exclusive: Shriha Speaks About the Issue of Contaminated Petrol, Suspension of His Salary, and Delay in Receiving His Dues from the National Oil Corporation… Here’s What He Demanded

Engineer Masoud Shriha stated in a comment to our source regarding the cancellation of the arbitrary transfer decision, in which the ruling was issued with an enforcement clause to cancel the decision and compensate with 10,000 Libyan dinars, a ruling that has not yet been executed by the National Oil Corporation. In contrast, foreign rulings related to corruption cases, such as the case of Lukoil, the supplier of contaminated petrol, the corporation quickly moves to implement the rulings and settle the case by paying the amount of 42 million dollars.

He also said: “I firmly believe that the involved company was surprised by the speed with which they agreed to the settlement, and their willingness to accept the Libyan position is evident in the company’s waiver of 20% of the announced amount.”

Shriha mentioned that as a Libyan citizen, he is supposed to enjoy his full rights within the country. During the case, he was deprived of his basic rights, as his salary was suspended for 8 months, and the corporation delayed the payment of his dues despite the issuance of an urgent ruling to stop the execution. Some of his dues have still not been paid to this day, and the latest ruling, a final judicial ruling from Libyan courts, has not been implemented. However, a foreign judicial ruling has been executed by the oil corporation, which clearly reflects disrespect and diminishment of the Libyan judiciary, the Attorney General’s office, and the security authorities.

He questioned the role of the rule of law, good governance, and citizenship rights, which our rulers often boast about.

He also called on the Prime Minister of the Government of National Unity (Abdulhamid Dbeibeh), who has repeatedly spoken out against injustice, to ensure justice is served and the court ruling is enforced.

Adding that, although he had hoped for good from the Prime Minister, his observations from what he sees and hears in the media give a poor impression of how his case is being handled, and he hopes he is wrong about this.

Shriha concluded by thanking the judiciary, which was fair and just in his case, and stressed the need for strict action against anyone obstructing the execution of rulings so that the pillars of justice are fulfilled by the concerned authorities. “God is sufficient for me, and He is the best disposer of affairs for those seeking personal and foreign interests at the expense of the nation and its citizens.”